E-SPLOST would fund schools
by KARISSA STEWART
Oct 04, 2010 | 2432 views | 29 29 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The city and county school systems are hoping voters will vote to accept the continuation of the one-penny sales tax which will fund new schools, technology improvements in the classrooms and provide cool air and heat in the gyms.

In the past, Calhoun and Gordon County school officials have relied on an education, special purpose local-options sales tax to build new schools and other million-dollar projects; now, they are hoping to continue the one-cent sales tax for the ESPLOST IV project.

ESPLOST IV, which will be voted on by Calhoun and Gordon County residents Nov. 2. If approved, the one-penny sales tax would bring in a projected $59 million; collections would begin in July 2012 and end by June 2017.

66.6 percent of the money would go toward improvements in the Gordon County School system and 33.4 percent would aid the Calhoun City School system.

The five-year-long ESPLOST plan has a few major projects, including a $33 million Calhoun High School and a new Calhoun Middle School complex combined together for the city school system and a $17 million new middle school for the county school.

“Our students deserve a facility that is safe and conducive to learning. New lighting and advanced technology are needed to provide the best education possible,” said Calhoun Superintendent Michele Taylor.

Gordon County Schools Superintendent Bill McCown echoes the same sentiments and added that he wanted to provide updated facilities to ensure a safe learning environment for students.

Calhoun City Schools ESPLOST projects:

The biggest item on the City’s education SPLOST list is a $33 million middle and high school complex, a two-story high school building that would be built in two main phases over a three-year period.

Phase I: The main two-story high school building would be built on the existing track area. Upon completion, high school students would then move into the new building; meantime, middle school students would then relocate to the older high school buildings.

Phase II: This will consist of razing the middle school older building wings dating back to 1954. This would cost approximately $650,000 out of the $33 million.

The overall plan for the two schools considers a shared kitchen and two media centers, officials stated.

“We do not wish for our sixth grade students to be in the same building as our high school students, so two cafeteria areas will definitely be in the plan,” said Superintendent Michele Taylor.

The construction of the new Calhoun High School and Middle School will be financed by $15.7 million in advanced funding from the State of Georgia, Taylor said.

The other projects include $1.6 million in improvements at Calhoun Primary and Elementary School and $400,000 would spent on purchasing additional school buses.

Amy Atkinson, chairwoman of the Calhoun Board of Education, doesn’t want voters to underestimate the importance of an updated school facility.

“The children of Calhoun and Gordon County deserve up-dated educational facilities,” Atkinson said, “many of our students will stay in Gordon County after graduating high school or college and open businesses or join our workforce. We want them to be well prepared with the best opportunities possible.”

Gordon County Schools ESPLOST projects:

Gordon County school officials have said one of their main needs is a new middle school and this project is first on their priority list.

Board members have allotted $5 million for it out of the $64,280,000 request list, which exceeds their $39 million proposal.

It is currently being called Northside Middle School and it would be located in the Red Bud area.

Next, renovation and modifications at Fairmount Elementary School would be next.

“The school has not had major renovations in the past 12 years,” said Susan Cole, spokesperson for the county school system.

Technology upgrades and replacements throughout the system, a career academy, auditoriums, air conditioning for gyms, new gyms and buses make up $14.2 million of the re-quest.

The priority list ends with a new elementary school for $14 million and renovations to several schools for $26.5 million.

William Tyner, chairman of the Gordon County Board of Education, said that there are many projects that are necessary whether or not the one-cents SPLOST passes or not.

“We have projects that are going to have to be taken care of,” Tyner said. “That doesn’t stop the projects, the roofs that need replaced, waterlines and outdated stuff.”

Too much taxing?

Some school officials worry the proposal could be a tough sell for some residents.

In an economy where every penny matters, Tyner said he worries that voters will not approve the education SPLOST IV because they are tired of being taxed. The current ESPLOST III expires in June 2010.

Jimmy Phillips, a Calhoun resident, supports the proposal.

“You can’t refuse to build a classroom if you need it,” Phil-lips said. “Sometimes old facilities need renovated and it’s probably the best penny that we could spend.”

“Thinking about a one penny sales tax or a property tax increase, this is a much better way to pay for it,” he added.

Overview of ESPLOST:

During the summer months, both school districts approved separate outlines of the education SPLOST (priority) projects list by passing what is known as an ESLOST referendum list.

A referendum describes a list of school projects and how the tax will be used if the education SPLOST passes with voters on Nov. 2.

In both referendum lists, it describes an agreement of how the monies will be split between Gordon County School district and Calhoun City Schools. This is based on the number of students.

Based on state Full Time Equivalent enrollment numbers for Gordon and Calhoun from March 2010:

Gordon County system had 6,453 students, making up 66.6 percent of the ESPLOST designation, and the school system is eligible for up to $39 million.

Calhoun City had 3,237 students, making up 33.4 percent of the ESPLOST designation, and the school system is eligible for up to $19 million.

The education SPLOST is collected on items subject to state sales taxes within the county and is generally levied for five years.

School officials have said funding the improvements through SPLOST is more equitable than raising the millage rate.

SPLOST is a levied tax on both county residents and any-one buying items in the county. School officials point out that the Prime Outlets in Calhoun helps bring in some of the money.

Approximately 40 percent of the revenue SPLOST generates comes from people who purchase services and products while visiting Gordon County, according to the Gordon County Chamber of Commerce business committee’s study.

According to Finance director Don Hood of Calhoun City Schools, the previous Calhoun City ESPLOST has brought in just under $9 million as of August 2010, which the ESPLOST will end in June 2012.

Gordon County has collected $16.6 million as of August in its current five-year ESPLOST, which ends in June 2012, said Finance director Gail Farriba of Gordon County Schools.

When asked if residents will see an increase in property tax if an ESPLOST doesn’t pass, both schools said it would be likely.

Overview of voting ballot:

Advance voting is already underway and many early voters have already poured in to vote on education SPLOST, said Shea Hicks, chairman of the county Board of Elections and voter registration.

Hicks pointed out that ESPLOST would appear differently on the ballots for City of Calhoun voters than for county voters.

For city of Calhoun voters, a question about the general obligation school bond election will appear on the ballot following the ESPLOST question.

“Calhoun City Schools operates under the charter of the City of Calhoun,” Hicks explained. “As outlined in the charter, the City of Calhoun issues bonds on behalf of the city schools; therefore, requiring voters to approve this in con-junction with a SPLOST referendum so that the schools can begin projects immediately.”

Comments
(29)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
MoeJoe
|
November 03, 2011
I asked the Chamber of Commerce Business Committee for a copy of the "study" showing 40 percent of the SPLOST revenue came from visitors. The response I got was no documentation to back up their claims. It was explained to me by one of the CCBC members that they had 2 or 3 retailers from the outlet mall, who wish to remain anonymous,count credit card receipts for an unknown period of time (one day? one week?). This was the extent of their study, and with this anonymous and undocumented information they arrived at the 40 percent non-local SPLOST revenue. Two things everyone should know. SPLOST is not applied to fuel (gas). SPLOST is applied to food and food ingredients (groceries). State tax is not applied to food and food ingredients which means that without SPLOST you would be paying ZERO tax on groceries.
VOTENOTWANTNOT!
|
October 29, 2011
Vote No! To any Future Splost Make Local Schools Boards and Commissioner and Councilmen and women be accountable for the Wasting of money! Here's a web site from past SPLOST read it and think about what you're doing! Http://residentwatchdog.com/index.html You're Taxes are the highest they've ever been and sales taxes are going higher if WE keep renewing and VOTING IN NEW SPLOST! Our only option now is to VOTE NO and Vote Out Current Politicians! They are supposed to do what we want instead of them telling you and myself what and where they are going to BLOW OUR HARD EARNED DOLLARS! Please Vote No! Have You Had A Raise from Work, Probably Not....Give Your Self A Raise Vote No!
Shoesandshoes
|
October 06, 2010
However you look at, it seems like a fair way to ensure that projects get completed especially when our children benefit.

I would much rather continue a penny than have taxes increased for the few property owners in our county.

It is only common sense and responsible.

XX23
|
October 06, 2010
Sorry about the table not being formatted for this program. It say's if you spend $1000 to $4000 you will pay $120 to $480 the first year, $240 to $960 the second year and $600 to $2400 the third year. The amount you contribute will increase each year SPLOST is in effect.
XX23
|
October 06, 2010
In practice the SPLOST combine many projects into one referendum. Often many of the projects do not enjoy broad community support but are included in the list as a favor to certain special interests. The voters often have to vote for five or ten projects that they oppose in order to pass the two or three that they strongly support. Another problem with current practice is that SPLOST referendums are often held concurrent with elections with low expected voter turnout and the special interests promoting the SPLOST can have a greater effect on the referendum. Below shows how much you will pay according to the amount you spend per month. Whether the illegals will be sharing the expense or not, I will be having to pay this in addition to my property tax. Plus you can count on a millage rate increase because the property assessments will have to come down due to low property values. What the illegals contribute will not cover the money wasted by the incompetent people in charge of spending the SPLOST. Every project that has been funded by SPLOST has documented evidence of extreme wasteful spending due to nothing more than the ignorance of those in charge of those projects. I dont have enough money to hand over to them so they can light a match to it.

If

you spend this You will pay this much

much per month

1 Year 2 Years 5 Years

$1,000 $120 $240 $600

$1,200 $144 $288 $720

$1,400 $168 $336 $840

$1,600 $192 $384 $960

$1,800 $216 $432 $1,080

$2,000 $240 $480 $1,200

$2,200 $264 $528 $1,320

$2,400 $288 $576 $1,440

$2,600 $312 $624 $1,560

$2,800 $336 $672 $1,680

$3,000 $360 $722 $1,800

$3,500 $420 $820 $2,100

$4,000 $480 $960 $2,400
RobertELee
|
October 05, 2010
I'm not against needs, just the way to finance them. My 1st choice would be income taxes and state paying for education like they should, but a sales tax I will never vote for.

Nor do I think we need to waste and overpay, btw that courthouse yard better look good for all the money dumped into it.

gordoncountypride
|
October 05, 2010
And the writer of this article should have started it by saying, voters would welcome the CONTINUATION....THIS IS NOT A NEW PENNY.
gordoncountypride
|
October 05, 2010
I believe we should all go and walk through the school buildings such as Fairmount, Tolbert, Swain, Calhoun Middle and High school. Several of these buildings need many repairs and renovations. 80 year old buildings can only be patched so much. Sonoraville has mobile buildings set up outside and with future growth will continue to need classrooms. Take time to gather the facts and then decide. ESPLOST is a continuation, not something new. We should be proud of the use of these funds to provide for the children of our entire county. This is local control, we don't have control over the Governor's decision to cut other funds for goods, services and agencies.
FromLife'sExperiences
|
October 05, 2010
@RobertELee

I so agree with what you stated (see below). Thanks for pointing this out. I am also concerned with the waste of funds we have seen historically throughout our country when money is available. I remember a TV documentary several years ago that had documentation to prove that our government was paying $500.00 for toilet seats and $50.00 for one two inch steel bolt. Of course the purchase of toilet seats and bolts was times thousands!!!

Local control of available funds is greatly needed but STRICT oversight and accountability is a MUST. The discrepancies that can be found on our local GIS site proves this. Sometimes, taxes levied on property is based on who you know and which assessor inspected your property --- not on the size or value of the property itself.

RobertELee wrote on Tuesday, Oct 05 at 10:17 AM »

The problem with these type of taxes is no one is accountable for the spending. You get boat loads of money in, then overpay and waste spending it. With property taxes, boards and commissioners are accountable thru elections and they would tend to be more thrifty and careful when spending money. Look at the jail, firestations and courthouse - All Overpaid, and now it cost more to run them.

One thing for sure, sales taxes have nothing to do with increasing property taxes as they just go up and up anyway. Since interest is so cheap, bonds could be sold to finance.

FromLife'sExperiences
|
October 05, 2010
@ Jackets87

I support SPLOST as a way to create revenue. Property taxes are way too high now and will continue to rise whether ESPLOST is passed or not.

In the current economic times (that won't be changing anytime soon), perhaps it is time Georgia laws were changed to allow SPOST funds to be used in the ways most needed by each community. State class size laws were changed by the stroke of the governor's pen. The number of school days provided to students was not sacred when funds were limited. Furlough days (for teachers with contracts that specify 190 work days) were allowed. Therefore, parameters for the use of SPLOST funds can be changed as well. I don't like the option but it may be necessary.

Students should have pride in their schools because of the experiences they accrue not because their school building is pretty. Granted, I want beautiful campuses in our beloved Gordon County, but the destruction and reconstruction of building because they are getting a little age on them is not a wise use of our tax monies. Many of Gordon Counties buildings and homes are 100 or more years old and they are still serving meaningful purposes and with proper care will be standing long after the current work force is gone. Let's not tear down classrooms just because they are a little old. We may need to slap some paint on them and patch the roofs for a while longer.

Yes, vote for the ESPLOST but at the same time let's make sure we and our law makers are screaming and yelling to get local control over the use of the funds collected. Now is not the time to be putting 39 million into buildings when our 20, 30 and 40 year old buildings could provide locations for outstanding instructional experiences provided by educational specialists with plentiful ancillary materials and supplies to support the instructional needs.
RobertELee
|
October 05, 2010
The problem with these type of taxes is no one is accountable for the spending. You get boat loads of money in, then overpay and waste spending it. With property taxes, boards and commissioners are accountable thru elections and they would tend to be more thrifty and careful when spending money. Look at the jail, firestations and courthouse - All Overpaid, and now it cost more to run them.

One thing for sure, sales taxes have nothing to do with increasing property taxes as they just go up and up anyway. Since interest is so cheap, bonds could be sold to finance.
XX23
|
October 05, 2010
I do not believe that 40% of the ESPLOST revenue comes from outside the county. The BOC and The BOE have said this for years and the percentage has never changed, always staying at 40%. If the BOE insist that it is true, show us the evidence. Show us the math and the proof. I'm not talking about statistical evidence either.
XX23
|
October 05, 2010
If you people think this ESPLOST is going to keep your property taxes from going up your wrong. As a matter of fact it almost guarantees that your property tax will go up. The taxpayers will be responsible for supplying the salaries for teachers, coaches, lunchroom workers, and all the other people who are hired to work at the school plus the electricity gas and water, the buses.... I could go on for awhile listing the things that drive up the enormous cost of maintaining a school. You can expect at the very least, 2 or 3 million added to our property tax on top of the ESPLOST. And the cost of maintaining the school will not go away after a few years. Is this really a good time to be adding this expense to our personal budgets. Because of issues with the federal government, I feel like we have seen nothing compared to the hard times ahead of us. I hope this is not true, but I can see no way of avoiding it unless the local and federal governments drastically reduce spending.
CuriouslyAbsent
|
October 05, 2010
The kids may need a new school, population-wise, but they're already being cheated; they get taught for the big tests and not much else. Quality suffers in the end and pride pretty much does too.
jackets87
|
October 04, 2010
From Life's Experience,

State laws prohibit using E-SPLOST proceeds for salaries or instructional materials. While it seems like a great idea, you can not fund salaries in the way you recommend. That is why the city and county both had to cut back on the school year. The state is sending less money to schools so they have to cut back. Please do not cheat the kids of this great city and county of what they need. A school that they can be proud of.
educationsupporter
|
October 04, 2010
I DO NOT want my child to go to school year round, nor extended days. Where do you think students will be housed if new schools are not built? They are not building these new schools to have pretty brick and mortar, they are building them because they need the room, and the buildings currently being used are way older than many of us. Yes, times are bad, but I would rather pay 1 cent over more property taxes.
FromLife'sExperiences
|
October 04, 2010
Fancy new buildings will never improve the educational quality of our youngsters. Direct instruction by dedicated, well trained educators given sufficient time and quality materials is what improves the instructional program.

Vote for the ESPLOST only if the funds are used to improve the instructional program through extended days of instruction and year round school for our youngsters. Increase the school year to 200 plus school days, hire well trained educators and pay and supervise them appropriately, provide state of the art learning tools and then stand back and watch our youngsters soar.

Pretty bricks and mortar may help Central Office administrators advance their careers but brick and mortar will not increase students' educational experiences. Artificial turf on the football field may give the Superintendent and Athletic Director/football coach a career boost but it won't improve the quality of education for the majority of our students.

People of Gordon County which includes Calhoun: Wake up, speak up, get involved.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.