UPDATE: Cortes charged with terroristic threats, DUI after attack on Sheriff's Office
by Staff reports
Aug 13, 2010 | 11580 views | 59 59 comments | 71 71 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Sheriff Dept. Attack
An attack was made on the Gordon County Sheriff s Department this morning. (Tricia Dillard/Calhoun Times)
view slideshow (7 images)
Johanna Cortes
Johanna Cortes
slideshow
Charges have been filed against the woman who allegedly ran into the Gordon County Sheriff's Department screaming she had a bomb.




Cortes visited several other places around the county before driving into the Fallen Peace Officers Monument at the sheriff's office Thursday. Exclusive details in the Saturday edition of the Calhoun Times - on newsstands now.
Johana Cortes, 24, of 1025 Erwin Hill Church Rd., in Calhoun was booked into the Gordon County Jail at 1 p.m. Thursday on charges of reckless driving, three counts of failing to return to the scene of an accident, terroristic threats and acts, interference with government property, criminal damage to property, and driving under the influence.

According to the GBI, Cortes was involved in a number of accidents around Calhoun GA prior to the incident at the Sheriff’s Office which occurred at 10:20am. She was driving a 2005, blue Toyota Corolla when she attempted to ram one of the entrances to the Sheriff’s Office. Instead, her vehicle hit the law enforcement memorial in front of that entrance.

The GBI press release stated that they are in the process of obtaining arrest warrants charging Cortes with Terroristic Threats and Acts, Interference with Government Property, and Criminal Damage to Property in the 2nd Degree.

Cortes, who the GBI has identified as a naturalized citizen from California who was originally from Guatemala, is currently in a Gordon County hospital under guard. Her local residence has not been determined as yet.

The GBI has determined there was no bomb in the car involved in an attempted attack on the Gordon County Sheriffs Department, according to Sheriff Mitch Ralston.

According to Chief Dep. Robert Paris, the driver sustained non-life-threatening injuries after she drove her passenger sedan into the monument dedicated to fallen police officers outside of the building at approximately 10:20 a.m.

"The driver made comments of possible explosives, and the building has been evacuated," said Paris.

According to Paris, the woman drove her car through the security fence, struck the monument, and attempted to flee from the vehicle. The woman was then arrested by one of the detectives in the building "at great risk."

"She was using her car as a weapon," said Paris. But there is no further information available on whether or not the driver was armed further.

Paris said no one in the building was harmed, but that it was cleared of occupants.

"We've evacuated the building ... It's a real safety issue," he said.

Crime tape surrounded the Resaca facility at the time of Paris' communication with the Calhoun Times.

The car was still in place late Thursday morning, according to Paris, and it had not been approached by local officials.

The GBI's Explosive Ordnance Disposal is en route to secure the area and investigate for possible explosives or harmful materials.

The department has also requested technical assistance from the FBI for further instructions on how to deal with this situation.

"We are extremely fortunate that no one inside our building, no innocent bystanders, were injured when this took place," said Paris. "This is the first incident of this type against a law enforcement facility that I am aware of in this area."

Floyd County officials said their bomb squad has been put on alert.
Comments
(59)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
excuseme
|
August 16, 2010
I found the warrant #127467 picture and code # that she violated #16-6-6 inmate #35135 booked in time 1610 release time 1701 cash bond 2000 charges are a felony
Welltraveled
|
August 16, 2010
Gribble,

Thanks for the clues, I Found Her!!
oldtimer63
|
August 15, 2010
dalegribble either i have sailed to far with Captain Morgan or maybe not far enough...can't seem to follow the dog lady's trail run those hints by me one more time. I missed all this the first time around and would have known nothing of it without following the comments section.
Welltraveled
|
August 14, 2010
Well it certainly wasn't the "dog lady" who let them out. She'd rather keep them in (close). She's like a Timex... takes a lot of lickin' and keeps on tickin'. They need to make sure she isn't fostering or adopting any dogs from the shelter, we'd hate to have to deal with sexually abused animals on top of all the humans too! And yeah, I've had a few too many tonight. Just had to check on my comedy section before I called it quits! Even after a few rounds with good old "Jack", I can still maintain proper English. That's pretty bad huh, a "tipsy" educated person can still compose better than most assumed sober posters. Geez, some of you REALLY need to take those grammar and spelling courses. Gribble, I need that hint... Is it CL? Guess maybe I could go down to the courthouse and excersise my FOIA rights about the "Dog Lady" and get the police report, mugshot, etc. and post it all on a separate blog, so that everyone can see, since the "special interest" censorship has kicked in. The Times, police, county, etc. can't keep the facts hidden from EDUCATED citizens that know the law, and their (our) rights, hard as they may try. The local gov't must think we are all too dumb to excersise our legal rights.
dirtysouth67
|
August 13, 2010
dalegribble, You are right,it is the same background. They must be taking the mugshots at animal control, WOOF, WHO LET THE DOGS OUT?
rocitryder
|
August 13, 2010
If you would have read my post.I said that everyones innocent until proven guilty.Now then if you and the rest of taxpayers want to foot the bill have at it.And yes I have had the misfortune of having to had to rely on a Public Defender.The DA was looking to crucify someone the Public Defender backed off to his best ability and I got crucified.I have no ill will towards Public Defenders just pointing out the fact that the money comes from the taxpayers.As far as the ACLU.If want to match wits with me on the subject.We can have a cup of coffee and discuss that matter further.I don't believe this is the proper arena for that.I stand by my "friggin' latino" remark unless you want disuss the First Admendment with me.
CuriouslyAbsent
|
August 13, 2010
The presumption of innocence is a right everyone gets regardless of how obviously guilty you think the criminal is. This is the reason the prosecutor must have enough convincing evidence for a jury to convict someone. If the prosecutor can't get enough evidence, isn't convincing enough or there is enough doubt as to guilt then even the guilty can be acquitted.

A public defender is also part of those rights afforded the accused. I guess you'd rather not have one, if it came to a point where you might need one, since they cost taxpayer money? Then again, you must think those public defenders aren't meant for a "friggin' latino" as opposed to those of a "whiter" complexion?

As to the ACLU, read about them for once and find out what they truly do. You might understand why they won't show for this one.
rocitryder
|
August 13, 2010
Hey folks your all a little off topic here.With your bickering about spelling.I love the first sentence in this articule about this friggin' woman ran her car though a fence and into the memorial at the jail.It kills me when The Times and The Police say "Alledgedly".Now I know everyones innocent until proven quilty.But come on folks.This person was caught running away from the car no one else around.Alledgedly is word that time has come to end and to easily used in todays society.If you get caught in the act of doing somthing illegal your guilty.Alledgedly means that this act is going to cost the "taxpayers" money.There going to have to bring a Public Defender to be her lawyer and The "ACLU" will have to get involved because the court system is trying to put a friggin' latino in jail for doing somthing wrong.I'm glad no one got hurt in this mess.
Joe_Bloggs
|
August 13, 2010
Hold on a minute. Let me get my Harbrace College Handbook.
dirtysouth67
|
August 13, 2010
OnlyMercedes, You GOT me, good reading. thanks
defiantone
|
August 13, 2010
OnlyMercedes, thank you. :) I appreciate you pointing that out. Have a blessed day.
OnlyMercedes
|
August 13, 2010
And Dirty, while pointing out Mrs.Megan's failure to capitalize the beginning of a sentence, I noticed that you failed to capitalize "I" when referring to yourself in the first person. Let he who lives in glass house, cast first stone.
OnlyMercedes
|
August 13, 2010
Oh, and defiantone while you are referring to good grammar and spelling please note that it is "descent", not decent!
Welltraveled
|
August 13, 2010
Defiantone,

I agree, completely! It is laughable, the lack of the most basic grammar and spelling that occurs on these posts. Good thing these folks live in Gordon County, because that crap would have them in the welfare lines in a more educated demographic. Unfortunately, your suggestion that they take a college course is not likely to happen, as they would be denied admission, because they are currently at a second grade level, at best.

Dirty,

If they are indeed college students, that's a scary thought!
dirtysouth67
|
August 13, 2010
DEFIANTONE,Hey man, calm down you are making some good points, don`t let them get to you. Let`s talk about the dog lady again. It`s just a bunch of college kids trying to sound like they are educated.
defiantone
|
August 13, 2010
Do you know how stupid you make yourself appear when you tell someone they are uneducated but you can't seem to make your argument without misspelling words and using horrible grammar? For example: It is racist not races and "you sound very uneducated with your remarks own how if you don't like the country get out.." I think you mean to use the word ON. Maybe someone should go to college and take an ENGLISH class. It really is not that difficult if you get over the laziness and just try.

Oh, and it is quite racist to assume that just because someone is of Latina decent that they are also here illegally. I, for the life of me, cannot figure out why someone would want to move to this country anyway. Americans are so rude with their "better than you" attitude. Yes, there are people living here illegally. Some of them are definitely bad seeds and then there are the rest of them that are just trying to provide for their families and give them a chance at having a better life than they would in "Mexico". By the way, speaking Spanish doesn't make you a Mexican. Not all illegal immigrants are from Mexico. When you make comments like that you are not only racist but also redneck, backwoods, ignorant, uneducated, and white trash. I don't think any of you would like it if people thought of you that way.
Calhounmustbeblissful
|
August 13, 2010
If the majority of people working in Gordon County are immigrants that's because they work for less and the mills give them preference in hiring not because they're better workers. Since the southern invasion in the 80's, 90's and, worse the Bush years of the 00's, starting wages have dropped and housing, food and utilities have gone up. Mohawk is going to have to pay the price for giving illegals preference, let's hope that Shaw and the others do too.
dirtysouth67
|
August 13, 2010
unksoldr, I`m sorry but i think you need a spelling lesson,it was pronounced CORTES not CORTZ, DUH,DUH,DUH. Go back and read the article. Have a nice day..... NEXT
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.