Battlefield park plans are back on
by Elizabeth Crumbly, General Manager
Apr 27, 2010 | 1126 views | 6 6 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
It seems plans for the Resaca Battlefield Park are back on.

The state has agreed to use $3.3 million to fund construction of roads, trails, parking lots and interpretive signage in what Gordon County Historic Preservation Commission Chairman Ken Padgett calls “phase one” of the project.

During a meeting Wednesday of last week, state officials agreed to put the money left over after phase one aside and “encumber” it to the county to use for a museum if local officials can come up with the extra funds needed, Gordon County Commission Chairman Alvin Long said.

Padgett said he hopes there will be at least $1 million left over for this from the state funds.

The encumbered money will be available for two years, during which time Long said the county will attempt to obtain another $1 million in financing through private donors and state and federal grants to put toward the museum.

He strictly specified that this money will not come from the county’s general budget.

“That is not my intention; never was my intention,” he stated. “We’re not going to jeopardize our county funds (or) our employees to do this.”

If the county is unable to match the state funds after two years, the encumbered funds will be absorbed back into the state’s budget, Long said.

Department of Natural Resources officials, Padgett said, wish to design a “more efficient” building than the originally planned museum, which he described as “ultra modern” and “not conducive” to the park’s overall design.

The county will arrange “a small interagency agreement” to maintain the fields and restrooms, he said.

Overall, Padgett said he is happy with the state’s agreement at this time.

“We’re ahead of the game,” he said. “I was very pleased.”

The meeting, which Long called “very successful,” included Department of Natural Resources Commissioner Chris Clark, along with State Sen. Don Thomas and Rep. John Meadows.

A long road

Earlier this year, the state announced it had only $3.3 million to put toward the Battlefield park, out of some $5 million originally dedicated to the project.

The state considered turning over the $3.3 million to the county after local officials said they though they could manage the project more cost effectively.

They feared they would lose the funds otherwise. However, the permits needed were “not transferable to the county,” Long explained, and the $1.7 million shortfall was too much for the county to fund.

The state took back control of the project in March.

  • Click here for more on the battlefield park and the floodplain issues that surrounded it earlier this year.

  • Comments
    (6)
    Comments-icon Post a Comment
    sister66
    |
    April 30, 2010
    What happened to the flood plain problem that supposedly stopped this project. I see no mention of it in this article.
    TruthSpeaker
    |
    April 27, 2010
    How close is the recectly acquired Padgett Resaca Property to this proposed project?
    RobertELee
    |
    April 27, 2010
    Maybe some of the state's teachers can visit on their furlough days off due to budget cuts. Sooner or later the county will end up paying for this.
    gismo911
    |
    April 27, 2010
    Call CANNONBALL he can tell ypu all about this
    Sugarvalley
    |
    April 27, 2010
    Long's politics: the conduct of public affairs for private advantage.
    terry1960
    |
    April 27, 2010
    They just will not let his project die, a pet project of a wealthy few. I can think of many many more things the money should and could be spent on. Traffic light turn signals for one, road widening projects, education. I can go on all day. This is a pork barrel project that will cost far more than it will return.
    Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.