Calhoun-Gordon County Airport to get new taxiway
by Sarah Bailey
Mar 29, 2012 | 1131 views | 8 8 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Calhoun-Gordon County Airport is hailing a taxiway.

The airport is in the early stages of adding to its facilities with the North Taxiway Project. Since the county has seen a recent growth in the population, the demand for additional space is becoming evident.

Calhoun City Council member David Hammond said that this is a step the airport needs to take if it wants to stay competitive with other regional airports in the area.

“It’s not necessary right now, but we do hope to expand with the growing population in Northwest Georgia, 100 percent occupation of the hangars and larger corporation footholds in the community,” said Hammond.

He explained that not only does the airport not have any empty hangars, but it is also likely to become busier in the next couple of years.

“It’s just the next logical step to be a bigger more congested airport, if the demand is there,” said Hammond. “If you look at every airport surrounding us, from one metro to another, the demand is growing unbelievably.”

The North Taxiway Project will simply make Calhoun a more desirable place to fly out of rather than going elsewhere. The project will give the airport its first full taxiway, according to Hammond.

“It (the taxiway) will run parallel to the runway, which allows for multiple aircraft in the area,” said Hammond. “It gives the ability to get one safely off the runway and bring one in to the taxiway, in case there was ever a need for a second one to land.”

Hammond explained that while the airport is currently not that congested, the taxiway will be an opportunity for the airport to take off.

“These are the steps you take to grow your airport to the next level of activity,” said Hammond. “That’s why you see 100 percent occupancy in the hangars right now.”

He explained how the taxiway works.

“What you do, if you are flying into the airport, you land on the runway; if you have a taxiway, you go to the end of the runway and you get on the taxiway to drive back to either the offices, the fuel depot or the hangars,” explained Hammond. “This would allow, in a congested time, for you to have another aircraft taking off on the runway or landing on the runway while the other one is on the taxiway.”

Airport officials are currently waiting for approval from the federal government and conducting environmental impact studies, which consist of how to properly reflow a stream that runs close to the airport, according to Calhoun-Gordon County Airport manager Dwight Albritton.

“There are lots of stages we have to go through,” said Albritton. “It’s in the early stages now, and the environmental studies are ongoing.”

According to Hammond, the potential taxiway is still going through the beginning steps.

“We’ve gotten the first preliminary prints, which all have to be approved by the FAA,” explained Hammond. “We will start trying to acquire land adjacent to the airport, then we will start with the second phase, which is land acquisition and then the third phase, which is build out.”

Albritton is eager to get the project underway, but doesn’t look for all the technicalities to be completed anytime soon.

“I do not anticipate moving dirt on it until the beginning of 2013,” said Albritton. “We have a long way to go.”
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
BARRYGOLDWATER
|
March 30, 2012
I've used the airport locally many times over the last few years and I have never seen a need for additional runway space. I don't care what pocket they take our tax dollars out of its being paid by us. There already is an alternate taxiway.

If you have 100% capacities at the airport charge more for the hangers. I have seen some for using these for garages for their cars and junk because they are cheaper than renting a commercial space. If they want to really improve the airport they desperately need new electronics that allow for landing and taking off in foul weather. I’ve had to use Rome when it was raining with low visibility.

Istillwantequalrights
|
March 30, 2012
Thanks RTE for making my point.We do not need our tax dollars wasted.There are more pressing issues than the upities of Calhoun and Gordon County sitting a few extra moments waiting to take off somewhere for the weekend .I say let the ones who are using it pay for it.I am certain if I asked them for a ride they would charge me even though I am paying for the airstrip.
rt_elms
|
March 30, 2012
Agreed! However, I know a few General Aviation types that certainly do not fall into the “uppity” category. They are working folks that enjoy flying their puddle-jumpers around the area on their off days, weather permitting. If we would be honest about things, those Mohawk Corporate jets are the real beneficiaries of any improvements to the airport. In my opinion, they should be carrying the load for these improvements. Cheers!
rt_elms
|
March 30, 2012
At around $0.20 per gallon tax on General Aviation gas, there is no way the bustling flight pattern over Calhoun will pay for this project. I drilled down into the FAA budget until my eyes crossed and found the Rural Airport Development Fund for 2012 has a budget of $100 Million. Even if 95% of the Tom B. David project will be funded by the FAA, that money came from the Department of Transportation, which is funded from the Treasury Department, which is funded by the taxpayers. Convoluted financials aside, we are paying for the improvements!
calhountimes
|
March 30, 2012
Thunderstick is correct. According to Dwight Albritton at the airport, the FAA and GDOT is responsible for 95 percent while the city and county are left with the remaining 5 percent from the Airport authority.
Thunderstick
|
March 29, 2012
The FAA will will pay for 95% of the project with funds from tax collected on aviation fuel sales.

Calhoun/Gordon county will only be responsible for the remaining 5%. An excellent way to fund a needed infrastructure improvement.
Istillwantequalrights
|
March 29, 2012
Who is paying for this project?

rt_elms
|
March 29, 2012
I imagine we are, but we wouldn’t know from reading the article. That’s your first clue.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.