Prater Ford Wins bid, Sheriff’s Office gets new cruisers
by ABBEY LENNON
Mar 21, 2012 | 4232 views | 15 15 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Gordon County’s Board of Commissioners accepted a bid at the Commissioners meeting Feb. 6, from Prater Ford in Calhoun to supply the Gordon County Sheriff’s Office with new vehicles to be used for patrol units.

The new units, with all costs included, will cost $30,254.40, for 32 units, totaling $968,140.

According to County Administrator Randy Dowling, one unit would cost $25,250.40, but that does not include other costs such as decals and equipment.

“You have to add decals, new video cameras, but all the existing equipment in the old cop cars are going to be transferred into the new ones,” said Dowling.

According to Dowling, $750,000 will come from the SPLOST funds, but because these funds will not be available for another 12 to 13 months, the $750,000 will be taken from the landfill fund. The remaining $218,140 will come from general reserve funds, explained Dowling.

Funds will be returned to the landfill after SPLOST dollars come in, said Dowling, but that is if the SPLOST dollars come in as predicted, he explained.

Prater Ford won because the business was the lowest bidder approved to supply the Sheriff’s Office.

According to Dowling, Ford has discontinued manufacturing the usual Crown Victoria Vehicles and is replacing them with the new Ford Taurus, but due to equipment size in the current Crown Victoria cruisers, purchasing all new equipment would be very expensive.

Gordon County Sheriff Mitch Ralston agrees that the discontinued Crown Victoria vehicles are what the Sheriff’s Office needs.

Patrol vehicles of the Sheriff’s Office have been Crown Victoria vehicles for over 20 years and the other cars that will soon replace the Crown Vic’s are untested, according to Ralston.

Purchasing the same brand of vehicles would provide familiarity for the deputies as well as a cost effective way to replace the equipment from the old cruisers to the new ones.

“We get an opportunity to get the last of the Crown Vic’s (they are tested); we know what we are getting,” said Ralston. “I have a deputy on staff that has agreed to take those (old) patrol cars, the ones with the equipment on it, take them apart and put them on the new cars, using inmate labor to help him, so that’s no cost to the county,” said Ralston.

The Sheriff’s Office anticipates giving the same number of old cruisers back to the county as they receive new ones, according to Dowling, and estimates all 32 vehicles will bring in between $30,000 to $35,000 at public auction,, and will be applied to the purchase price.

Dowling explained the current Crown Victoria cruisers were fairly old. Twenty new units were purchased in 2003 and again in 2008, 28 more were purchased, said Dowling.

The date for public auction has not been set, according to Dowling; the vehicles must first be approved as surplus by the board.

“When is the auction? We don’t know yet. We cannot sell them individually to the public. The board has to declare them surplus and go to public sale,” said Dowling. “We cannot do private sales to individuals.”

Ralston explained he would work to end the practice of purchasing whole “fleets” of cars at one time to prevent the cumbersome costs associated with purchasing large numbers of new units.

“What happens is when you get so many at one time, those 28 vehicles wire out at the same time,” said Ralston. “That’s why I want to get out of getting so many at one time because it puts a burden on the department but also on the taxpayers,” said Ralston.

Concern from the Floor

Concerns from the floor during the work session of the Gordon County Commissioners meeting were heard before the bid was approved.

“We are going to have to pull more than $200,000 out of general fund reserves to fund these patrol cars,” said Martin Vaughn, Purchasing Director for the Gordon County Finance Department.

“I know that he (Ralston) has a responsibility to patrol the streets and he can’t do it without the proper equipment, but you have a responsibility to the tax payers to not spend so much of their money. From the finance department we don’t think we should be taking money out of the general fund or any reserve fund,” he said.

In a later statement, Vaughn explained he did not oppose purchasing the vehicles, just where the funds came from to purchase them.

“I am not in opposition, I just believe that we need to examine carefully anytime we spend our reserves,” said Vaughn.

Prater Ford was able to find the discontinued cars and have them shipped within two weeks, so the timely opportunity to replace the older vehicles is an “opportunity that I don’t think we can pass up [budgetary wise],” said Gordon County Commissioner Alvin Long.

According to Ralston, the deputies will be able to replace equipment from old cruisers to new ones and turn out three to four cars a week.

Providing equipment exchange will save the county $180,000 with using inmate labor, said Ralston.

Ralston is grateful for the SPLOST funds and explains that the department would be in “dire straights” without the funding for the new cruisers.

“We wouldn’t be getting cars if it wasn’t for the SPLOST. We are glad the folks in the county voted for it,” said Ralston.

Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
maybemaybe
|
March 26, 2012
I have always had good service with Prater Ford. Keep it in the County.
rotorooters
|
March 26, 2012
I do agree that Prater Ford provides good service. We no longer have multiple full service dealerships in our area and it is good that Prater Ford remains strong and competitive.
gogabulldogs
|
March 26, 2012
Prater Ford has a great reputation for service.
oldman76
|
March 23, 2012
I would not put much stock in comments from the finance director. He does not have a very good track record of spending the taxpayers money himself. I would suspect either he did not get to handle the purchase and the sheriff took the bids or he did not get to push the purchase to one of HIS favorites. Of ALL the money the comissioners have taken from the landfill and reserves has he questioned it before?
TTSSYF
|
March 25, 2012
The truth is:

1) The finance director was never quoted in this article, it was the purchasing director.

2) "spending the taxpayer's money" : the purchasing director does not spend any of the money, this is either done by the department heads or the Board of Commissioners. But either way all spending is done openly and any bid history can be requested.

3) all bids are delivered sealed and are opened in a public meeting.
rotorooters
|
March 26, 2012
I agree with Oldman
Cortez_sez
|
March 22, 2012
explains alot about why the garbage rates went up
TTSSYF
|
March 25, 2012
The Truth Is:

The county government has nothing to do with city garbage collection rates. This is completely a city of Calhoun issue.
Cortez_sez
|
March 25, 2012
did i say city?

truth is you didn't read very well
lovemttown
|
March 21, 2012
LETS MAKE SURE THAT THEY GET NEW S.U.V. FOR THOSE THAT CAN DRIVE THEM FOR PERSONAL USE THAT WASTE GAS THAT WE AS TAX PAYERS PROVIDE ALSO BUDGET FOR A DEVICE THAT WILL ONLY LET UNIT GO THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT UNLESS THEY ARE RESPONDING TO AN EMERGENCY
frustraited
|
March 21, 2012
One of our well known local veterans widow recently took her car to be repaired at this place. She was billed for $1200, and the car was still not repaired.

If this is the way they are going to treat our Veteran's widows and family. I wouldn't buy anything from them.

Shame on you!
CalhounYJfan
|
March 22, 2012
I have never had anything repaired there or bought anything from them BUT I have heard many bad comments on the service! A good, honest mechanic is hard to find but there are a few in this county that have helped me in the past without gouging me or making me pay for things that weren't broke in the first place.

Caveat emptor!!!
maybeme
|
March 22, 2012
I have purchased a number of vehicles from Prater Ford and I have had excellent service during the past 40 years. The cost of service is generally higher than my local "shade tree mechanic" but the dealership's service comes with a guarantee.

I am very happy a local vendor's bid was accepted. It is always good when Gordon County keeps our tax money in the county!
CalhounYJfan
|
March 21, 2012
Ok, Lets see what those opposed to the CID getting new vehicles have to say about these the GCSD are getting!!!

I think it's great they are getting these vehicles and be cost efficient at the same time...I agree with Mr Vaughn though, isn't there another way to pay for these without using reserve funds. The CID is using seized money to pay for their new vehicles, does the GC Sheriff's Dept have a seized money account at all? (I am asking because I don't know, so please, somebody intelligent answer my question!)
positiveoutlook
|
March 21, 2012
I was "one of those opposed to the SEVEN CID vehicles". I can see a need for replacing "patrol" cars with high mileage because they are used daily. The opposition was against 7...........let me repeat SEVEN CID vehicles. Just because money is available doesn't mean we have to spend it on unnecessary and excessive things. I have no problem with anything in the above article.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.