OJ's ex-lawyer contradicts his testimony on guns
by KEN RITTER,LINDA DEUTSCH,Associated Press
May 18, 2013 | 34 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Defense attorney Patricia Palm, left, and O.J. Simpson appear at an evidentiary hearing in Clark County District Court on May 17, 2013 in Las Vegas. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison as a result of his October 2008 conviction for armed robbery and kidnapping charges, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial, claiming he had such bad representation that his conviction should be reversed. (AP Photo/Ethan Miller, Pool)
Defense attorney Patricia Palm, left, and O.J. Simpson appear at an evidentiary hearing in Clark County District Court on May 17, 2013 in Las Vegas. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison as a result of his October 2008 conviction for armed robbery and kidnapping charges, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial, claiming he had such bad representation that his conviction should be reversed. (AP Photo/Ethan Miller, Pool)
slideshow
LAS VEGAS (AP) — O.J. Simpson's former lawyer defended himself point-by-point Friday against allegations he botched the former football star's armed-robbery trial, after giving damaging testimony that Simpson actually knew his buddies had guns when they went to a hotel room together to reclaim some sports memorabilia. Miami-based attorney Yale Galanter quickly found himself under withering cross-examination from a Simpson lawyer intent on proving that Galanter's word couldn't be trusted — that he knew ahead of time of Simpson's plan and spent more effort covering up his involvement than representing Simpson. The weeklong hearing concluded late Friday with Clark County District Judge Linda Marie Bell telling attorneys she will issue her decision in writing. She didn't specify a date. Simpson was returned to prison custody. His attorneys, Patricia Palm and Ozzie Fumo, said they were optimistic that the judge would grant a new trial. "I just think the evidence of his claims is overwhelming," Palm said. Galanter took the stand as the state's star witness in a hearing on Simpson's claim that he was so badly represented at trial and on appeal that his conviction should be thrown out. He spent most of the day on the defensive, with Simpson lawyer Tom Pitaro grilling him with accusations and pointed questions. "Mr. Simpson never told me he was going to go to the Palace (Station) hotel with a bunch of thugs, kidnap people and take property by force," Galanter said at one point. "To insinuate I, as his lawyer, would have blessed it is insane." Galanter conceded at one point that Simpson's conviction was his responsibility. At another point, he conceded that he "misspoke" when he told the trial judge, Jackie Glass, that crucial audio recordings had been carefully analyzed by experts. "Clearly I misspoke," Galanter said as Pitaro bored in. "I would never, ever ... I would just never intentionally mislead a judicial officer or a lawyer. I'm falling on that sword." Galanter denied giving Simpson the go-ahead to retrieve the photos and footballs he believed had been stolen from him. He denied keeping Simpson in the dark about offers of plea deals that carried only a few years in prison. He said his client agreed all along with the decision not to put him on the stand to testify at his trial. And he disputed Simpson's testimony from earlier this week when the former NFL star said he didn't know anyone in the hotel room had guns. "When you look at the entire trial, I don't think I could have fought harder, done more," Galanter said. "I put every ounce of blood, sweat and soul into it." At another point, he said: "Simpson brought a lot of baggage into the courtroom. It's not like the 12 jurors didn't know he was accused of murder and acquitted." Simpson, 65, was found guilty in 2008 of kidnapping and armed robbery over the hotel room episode and was sentenced to nine to 33 years in prison. The conviction came 13 years to the day after his "trial of the century" acquittal in Los Angeles in the murders of his ex-wife and a friend of hers. Galanter testified that Simpson confided to him that he had asked two men to bring guns to the hotel room in September 2007, and "he knew he screwed up." On the stand, Galanter brought up the guns only after he paused and was reminded that Simpson had waived attorney-client privilege. "I'm very uncomfortable doing this," he said. Testifying about events leading up to the incident, Galanter said he was surprised when Simpson told him over dinner in Las Vegas that he and several other men were planning a "sting" the next morning to take back the mementos. Galanter said he advised Simpson not to take matters into his own hands: "I said, 'O.J., you've got to call the police.'" Simpson testified that Galanter advised him that he was within his rights to retrieve the items, told him not to testify at the trial, and failed to tell him prosecutors had offered plea bargains. During questioning about how much Galanter was paid for the case, the judge asked Pitaro where he was going with his questions. "What Mr. Galanter has done is, this man has received over a half-million dollars and has put his interest, his financial interest, above the interest of his client," Pitaro said. Galanter insisted he told Simpson at least three times that prosecutors discussed plea bargains. He said Simpson rejected them. Simpson said, "No deal. No way," to an offer from the district attorney of five to seven years in prison, Galanter said. Later, during the trial, Simpson turned down a better offer, Galanter said. "I went out in the hall and said to O.J., 'There is an offer of two to five.' He said, 'See if they will take a year,'" Galanter testified. "I discussed a year with them, and they said no and the trial went on." If Simpson succeeds in getting his conviction thrown out, prosecutors will have to decide whether to retry him or offer a plea bargain. If he loses, he will be sent back to prison and will probably appeal. He will be 70 before he is eligible for parole. ___ Find Ken Ritter at http://twitter.com/krttr .
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
How we financed and closed a deal in three days
by BILL AND KIM COOK
May 18, 2013 | 112 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Our last column sure brought in a ton of calls and emails. In that column, we explained how last month we found, closed and financed a home in just three days by knocking on sellers’ doors – and didn’t use any of our own money. (You’ll find that column on our website titled, “What’s Old is What’s New.”) Here are the most common questions we were asked: What is a private-money lender and how do you find them? Why do private-money lenders lend to you? How are private-money lenders secured and paid? More than a decade ago, Kim and I learned that a bank wasn’t the only place to get a mortgage. There are individuals who will loan you their own money and fund your deals. While banks are a good source of long-term financing, when you need a quick closing, because banks require a mountain of paperwork and weeks to verify your information, it often takes a month or more to get an institutional loan. On the other hand, when dealing with at PML, because you’re dealing with a real person and the purchase property is being used as collateral for the loan, we’re often able to get immediate funding and close within a day or two. This is exactly what happened with our April purchase. We’ve never sought out PML – they come to us. Over time, an investor builds his/her reputation. If your reputation is a good one, lenders will seek you out. If your reputation isn’t so hot, you’ll just hear crickets and no one will touch you with a ten-foot pole. If you’re new, you may want to partner with an experienced investor with a solid reputation – the investor can bring credibility to your deal. Why do PML lend to us? They seek a good return – a better return than they can get at the bank. For example: Several weeks back, a couple contacted us. They had a $350,000 CD paying 4.1 percent interest. Their CD was maturing. The CD paid them $14,350 per year. This money, combined with their social security and pension income, ensured they lived comfortably. Problem was, when they rolled into a new CD, their interest rate was going to drop to a microscopic 0.72 percent. This meant that their yearly investment income would DROP by $11,830 – a huge financial blow to someone on fixed income. This couple wanted to know if they could loan us money, secured by a property, at 4.1 percent interest. Theirs was a win-win offer. They would be able to maintain their standard of living and we’d be able to work with a PML. So let’s look at how we financed the Green Acre house that we bought last month. On a Saturday, the seller agreed to a sale price of $50,000 if we closed in three days. We determined the house needed a $10,000 facelift. We contacted a PML who agreed to loan us $60,000 to buy the property. The PML lender wired $60,000 to Lee Perkins, our closing attorney. Three days later, as promised, we bought the property. Today, the property is being rehabbed and will soon be offered for rent. Private-money lenders allowed us to close on Green Acre quickly – without a lot of red tape. It allowed the seller to put the property behind her. It gave the PML a return that she can’t get at the bank. Like I said, a win-win deal. Bill and Kim’s North Georgia Real Estate Investors Association meets on the second Thursday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Hilton Garden Inn off Main Street in Cartersville, Georgia. For more info, go to REIoutpost.com.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Probe begins after Conn. commuter trains crash
by SUSAN HAIGH,Associated Press
May 18, 2013 | 92 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Emergency personnel work at the scene where two Metro North commuter trains collided, Friday, May 17, 2013 near Fairfield, Conn. Bill Kaempffer, a spokesman for Bridgeport public safety, told The Associated Press approximately 49 people were injured, including four with serious injuries. About 250 people were on board the two trains, he said. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Christian Abraham)
Emergency personnel work at the scene where two Metro North commuter trains collided, Friday, May 17, 2013 near Fairfield, Conn. Bill Kaempffer, a spokesman for Bridgeport public safety, told The Associated Press approximately 49 people were injured, including four with serious injuries. About 250 people were on board the two trains, he said. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Christian Abraham)
slideshow
FAIRFIELD, Conn. (AP) — Two commuter trains packed with rush-hour commuters collided in an accident that sent about 70 people to the hospital, severely damaged the tracks and threatened to snarl travel in the congested Northeast Corridor. Three patients remained in critical condition Saturday morning, with two of those stable, according to officials at two Bridgeport hospitals. The crash happened Friday evening on the Metro-North Railroad, which serves the northern suburbs of New York City. Passengers described a chaotic, terrifying scene of crunching metal and flying bodies. "All I know was I was in the air, hitting seats, bouncing around, flying down the aisle and finally I came to a stop on one seat," Lola Oliver, 49, of Bridgeport, told The Associated Press. "It happened so fast I had no idea what was going on. All I know is we crashed." About 700 people were on board the Metro-North trains when one heading east from New York City's Grand Central Station to New Haven derailed about 6:10 p.m. just outside Bridgeport, MTA and Bridgeport officials said. The train was hit by a train heading west from New Haven to Grand Central on an adjacent track, MTA spokesman Aaron Donovan said. Some cars on the second train also derailed as a result of the collision. "We're most concerned about the injured and ultimately reopening the system," Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said from the scene about three hours after the crash. A team from the National Transportation Safety Board was headed to the area to survey the crash site Saturday morning with Malloy, U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy and other Connecticut officials, according to Malloy's office. Officials planned to update journalists on the crash following the tour. Malloy said most people in the crash were not seriously hurt. Among those critically injured, he said, one's injuries were "very critical." The nursing supervisor at St. Vincent Medical Center said Saturday morning that 44 people from the crash had been treated there, and that five of those were admitted. One of the five remained in critical condition but was now stable, the supervisor said. Bridgeport Hospital spokesman John Cappiello said two patients were admitted in critical condition, and one of those was now stable. The hospital treated 24 other patients from the crash, and many had been released already with the rest expected to be released by late Saturday morning, Cappiello said. The Metro-North Railroad, a commuter line serving the northern suburbs, described it as a "major derailment." Photos showed a train car askew on the rails, with its end smashed up and brushing against another train. Malloy said there was extensive damage to the train cars and the track, and it could take until Monday for normal service to be restored. He said the accident will have a "big impact on the Northeast Corridor." Amtrak, which uses the same rails, suspended service indefinitely between New York and Boston. Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch said the disruption caused by the train accident could cost the region's economy millions of dollars. "A lot of people rely on this, and we've got to get this reconnected as soon as possible," Finch said. Investigators Friday night did not know what caused the first train to derail. Malloy said there was no reason to believe it was anything other than an accident. Passenger Bradley Agar of Westport, Conn., said he was in the first car of the westbound train when he heard screaming and the window smash behind him. "I saw the first hit, the bump, bump, bump all the way down," he said. Agar had returned to work this week for the first time since breaking his shoulder in January. And since he was still healing, he thought it would be safer to take the train than drive. The area where the accident happened was already down to two tracks because of repair work, Malloy said. Crews have been working for a long time on the electric lines above the tracks, the power source for the trains. He said Connecticut has an old system and no other alternate tracks. By late evening, Bridgeport Police Chief Joseph Gaudett said everybody who needed treatment had been attended to, and authorities were beginning to turn their attention to investigating the cause. "Everybody seemed pretty calm," he said. "Everybody was thankful they didn't get seriously hurt. They were anxious to get home to their families." The Metropolitan Transportation Authority operates the Metro-North Railroad, the second-largest commuter railroad in the nation. The Metro-North main lines — the Hudson, Harlem, and New Haven — run northward from New York City's Grand Central Terminal into suburban New York and Connecticut. ___ Associated Press writer Michael Melia contributed to this report from Hartford, Conn.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Pre-battle ceremony kicks off events
by Abbigail Lennon
May 18, 2013 | 192 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Both Confederate and Union troops gathered to honor those who fought and died during the Battle of Resaca, at the Resaca Confederate Cemetery, Saturday, May 18. (Abbey Lennon/Staff).
view slideshow (3 images)
Both Confederate and Union troop reenactors gathered this morning at the Resaca Confederate Cemetery at 10 a.m., to witness the laying of the wreath. Speaker at the event was General Ken Padgett, whose ancestor fought at the Battle of Resaca. Padgett gave reference to the 150th anniversary that will take place next year over a three day period. Padgett explained events that take place over the historical weekend, continue to put Resaca on the map. Gordon County Chamber of Commerce President Jimmy Phillips also spoke to a small crowd who showed up to the overcast, cool morning ceremony. Musician Jule Medders presented an original song honoring Mary Green, the woman whose actions started one of the first Confederate cemeteries at Resaca. Troops are at the battle field and the public is welcome to meet and greet reenactors who have traveled from all over the nation to participate in the historical battle reenactment. Camps at the battlegrounds will close at 1 p.m., and will reopen at 2 p.m. when the battle will start. Saturday: 1 p.m. - Camps closed to the public 2 p.m. - Battle Reenactment 6 p.m. - Site and Camps closed to the public Sunday 9 a.m. - Site and Camps open to the public 9 a.m. - Dress review and Colors for both armies near the field 10 a.m. - Non-denominational 1860’s Church Service 1 p.m. - Camps closed to the public 2 p.m. - Battle Reenactment 5 p.m. - Site closed to the public (Note - Special Living History demonstrations will be ongoing the entire weekend.)
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.